Do You Need To Have A Full Frqamed Camera To Take Professional Pictures
Whether you're a student or a seasoned veteran, selecting the right camera can brand your head spin with questions. Does sensor size matter? What's the difference between iv:two:0 and iv:two:2? Exercise I really need a camera that tin can record 4K? What about raw? We'll explain the key components that help a camera produce cinematic images, and in doing so, hopefully help yous make that earth-shaking conclusion.
Evaluate Your Needs and Your Budget
Before considering certain cameras, you must know your needs and your budget. And be realistic. If you lot are a student or relatively new to filmmaking, consider starting with a more affordable option, rather than jumping into the deep end with something that may be overkill for your needs. Fortunately, obtaining cinematic results has go increasingly affordable, thanks to the ascension in video capabilities of DSLRs and mirrorless cameras, and the subtract in price of larger, professional person cameras.
You also demand to be wary of hidden costs. The price of a camera might look corking at starting time, but what if it needs a separately available electronic viewfinder and shoulder rig to function the fashion yous need it to, or an external recorder to get the highest image quality? Let'south not forget near lenses, actress batteries, and media cards. In short, before you make your buy, take a step back and consider the whole package. The final matter you want to practise is spend your savings on a photographic camera that will only serve as an expensive paperweight until you tin can afford to outfit it properly.
The Cinematic Expect
It helps to look at the big boys—the summit-of-the-line cameras being used to make major move pictures. Why are they existence selected? What do they offer that brand directors, DPs, and producers pick them over others for their productions? When reading interviews, y'all'll oftentimes discover it's because the photographic camera could produce cinematic images with high dynamic range that feel "filmic." When discussing different aspects of digital movie theater cameras, you lot'll find me constantly referring to film as the reference point.
So, what does information technology mean to look "cinematic?" Every bit a moviegoer, your eyes and brain have been trained over the years to know how a moving picture should look. You as well know—mayhap even more so—when something does not look cinematic. While professional set design, lighting, and shot selection play a significant office in achieving the cinematic await, many photographic camera factors contribute, likewise, including epitome-sensor size, resolution, dynamic range, and color sampling. These are some of the major factors that you'll demand to consider, along with more applied considerations, such as recording formats, connectivity, and form factor.
Lens Mount
Ane of the cardinal aspects of cinematography is lens option, so this should be one of the first factors you consider when selecting a camera. At that place are several standard lens mounts, including native DSLR mounts, such as Catechism EF and Nikon F; mirrorless photographic camera mounts, such equally Micro Four Thirds or Sony E; and the PL mount constitute on high-end movie theater cameras. Some mounts are more adaptable than others. For instance, the brusk flange focal distance of mirrorless camera mounts makes them hands adaptable to other mount types using readily available adapter rings. This opens a seemingly endless selection of vintage and modern lenses, giving you the flexibility and freedom to select lenses based on your upkeep and the look you desire.
While mirrorless camera mounts are more adjustable, this doesn't mean y'all should avoid cameras with DSLR mounts. Today, many cinematics-fashion lenses are available for DSLR systems. For instance, Zeiss CP.three Compact Primes are available for Canon EF, Nikon F, Sony E, and MFT mounts, in add-on to PL. DSLR systems also take a rich selection of native lenses, though these aren't always the best selection for movie theater use, due to the lack of manual discontinuity rings and electronic or focus-by-wire focusing systems that make them difficult to pull focus with and impossible-to-do smooth iris pulls.
Zeiss Interchangeable Mount Set up EF
The PL mount is the standard for professional cinema cameras and lenses, though both tend to be on the expensive side. If it'south within your budget, or if you plan on renting lenses for each product, and so there is nil wrong with going the PL route. Some picture palace cameras have mounts that can be swapped out, so you're not roped into a single choice. Knowing the lenses yous take bachelor or programme on purchasing will play a major office in selecting a camera.
Sensor Size
The epitome sensor is the heart of the digital camera. When talking nearly sensor size, many people will tell you that bigger is better. In many means, they are right, though size isn't everything. In the however photography world, the "standard" is referred to equally "full frame," which is roughly the same size as an prototype captured on 35mm film; anything smaller than that size is often described as having a "ingather factor," though this is a term of which I'm not overly addicted.
In the cinema earth, the standard sensor size has developed around the Super 35 (3-perf 35mm) frame, which has a ingather factor of approximately 1.5x compared to full frame. For people coming from the stills world, this is well-nigh the same size as an APS-C sensor capturing 16:9 video. Office of the reason that I don't like the term "crop factor" is that for nigh cinematographers, the motion picture 35mm frame is their standard, not full-frame. However, with digital sensors replacing 35mm film and full-frame cameras being used increasingly for video work, the distinction is becoming more than of a gray area, and so crop factor does, at the very least, give a standard reference betoken from which to compare sensor sizes.
Bending of View and Aesthetics
Then why does the size of the sensor matter? Sensor size directly influences many imaging characteristics, including lens compatibility, angle of view at a given focal length, and apparent depth of field. All lenses project an image circumvolve onto the sensor large plenty to cover the format for which they are designed; a lens designed for a full-frame camera volition cover full-frame sensors, an APS-C lens will cover APS-C sized sensors, and then on. Lenses volition besides cover sensors smaller than the format for which they are designed, just if you endeavor to employ them on larger sensors, and then you may see vignetting or even the edge of the image circumvolve.
The smaller the sensor size, the smaller the portion of the image circumvolve is captured, which means that the angle of view—or width of the scene that is captured—decreases. For instance, a 50mm lens on the full-frame sensor of a Canon 5D Mark Iv will have almost a 40-degree angle of view, while the same lens on the Super 35 sensor of the Sony F5 will only exist effectually 25 degrees. To get the equivalent angle of view of the 5D, the F5 would need to apply a lens effectually 32mm. Comparing or trying to match angle of view between 2 cameras with different sensors is where thinking in terms of ingather factor can come in handy.
APS C Sensor
A "normal" lens is one that, for any given format, renders an image with perspective like the mode you see the world. The full general formula says that a "normal" lens has a focal length similar the diagonal measurement of the sensor; on Super 16 this is going to be smaller than a normal lens on Super 35, which will be smaller still than a normal lens on total frame. The same can be said for broad-bending and telephoto lenses. This gives different formats/sensor sizes their own aesthetic—even though the angle of view changes, the perspective and how linear space is distorted does not.
Depth of Field
For many people, a chief do good of a larger sensor is the ability to accomplish shallower depth of field. Frame a shot with a lens at f/2.viii with a full-frame camera and it will appear shallower than a shot with the same lens, framing, and aperture on a Super 35 sensor. Being able to separate your subject from the background using shallow depth of field is a definite component to achieving a cinematic expect. And then, bigger is better then, correct? Well, not necessarily. You lot can still achieve cinematic shallow depth of field on Super 35, Micro Four Thirds, and even Super 16 formats. Likewise, the shallower the depth of field is, the harder it is to keep a subject in focus during the shot, even for an experienced focus puller. Workable depth of field might mean stopping downwards to f/4 or even f/5.half-dozen on full frame and losing some stops of lite, while a Super 35 photographic camera might exist fine at f/2.viii.
Having shot with Super 16, Micro 4 Thirds, Super 35, and full-frame sensor sizes, I tend to discover Super 35 to conform the way I shoot best, while giving me that classic cinematic aesthetic. It also opens a wider selection of lenses, including modernistic and vintage cinema lenses that won't cover total-frame sensors. Notwithstanding, full frame is becoming more than common in the video world and many movie theatre lenses, as well as re-housed DSLR lenses that cover full-frame sensors are becoming available to arrange this trend.
Dynamic Range
The dynamic range of a photographic camera is the range in luminance it can capture; substantially, how much shadow and highlight detail tin can be reproduced earlier hit pure black or pure white. For many years, dynamic range was one of the main areas in which digital sensors cruel brusk when compared to flick. Think of all the digital footage you've seen where a window or heaven was blown out and just looked white, with little to no information present. Now picture that same scene in a movie shot on film where there is still color in the sky and details through the window. Proper lighting and working within the useable range of a camera certainly helps, but the limitation of older digital cameras was apparently to meet.
Cameras with a wide dynamic range tin can concord onto more detail in the shadows and highlights. The image on the left shows what an epitome with wide dynamic range would look like and the image on the correct shows what the same image would look like with narrow dynamic range
A broad dynamic range is one of the cardinal components of the cinematic look. Modern 35mm picture show film has upwards of 14 stops of dynamic range. While simply the height-of-the-line digital cinema cameras tend to approach moving-picture show in this regard, more affordable options, such equally the Sony FS7, FS7 II, Canon Movie theatre EOS line, Blackmagic Blueprint cameras, and even mirrorless cameras, such equally the Sony a7S 2 and a7RIII, offer big dynamic ranges.
Log Gamma
To capture the most dynamic range, look for cameras that offer "log" gamma curves. Rather than baking-in a contrasty, finished await in-camera, log gamma curves yield a flatter image that preserves more information in the shadows and highlights, and thus a larger dynamic range. This gives you—or the colorist—the power to create the final look during postal service production and preserve the shadow and highlight details that would otherwise have been lost had it not been recorded using a log gamma bend. A flatter prototype also gives you greater command to adjust colors in post to make corrections and define the creative await of your movie.
Not each log gamma is the same, with each company offering its own flavour. For case, Sony has its South-Log2 and Due south-Log3 gammas, Canon has C-log, Panasonic has 5-Log and 5-Log L, ARRI has Log C, and and then on. Log gammas require experience to color-grade properly, and so accept that into consideration when purchasing a camera with a log gamma option. A good place to start would be to use a pre-built 3D LUT (Wait Up Table) within your color-grading application to bring contrast and saturation back into your image and transform to the desired output color space, such as Rec. 709. From there, you tin can tweak your image and, in time, grade from scratch or fifty-fifty build your own custom LUTs. In that location is besides a variety of available LUT packages and plug-ins that will mimic the look of pop film stocks, which can assistance requite your images an even more than cinematic quality.
Resolution
When talking most resolution, we need to consider both the resolution of the recorded video file and the resolution of the sensor. Many professional cinema cameras will accept sensors with resolutions that match the highest-resolution video that the camera can record. The Sony F5 and F55, for example, use an 8.9MP sensor that allows them to natively capture 4K (4096 x 2160) or Ultra HD (3840 x 2160) video. On the other paw, DSLRs and cameras designed for yet photography can take sensors with resolutions of 24MP or higher. To record 4K or 1080p from those sensors, they oftentimes skip unabridged rows of pixels (line skipping), combine the information of adjacent pixels together to create a single pixel (pixel binning), or both. This tin can have a negative impact on the prototype, including the introduction of moiré and aliasing, depending on the camera.
Not all DSLRs and mirrorless cameras resort to line skipping or pixel binning. The Sony a7S, for example, has a 12MP sensor that, in video mode, delivers full-pixel readout for Ultra Hard disk drive (3840 x 2160) recording. In 1080p manner, it downscales the full UHD image to 1080p, doing binning on the image-processor level rather than on the sensor, for improved results. Other cameras, like the Panasonic GH4, utilise a crop of the sensor for native 4K resolution while even the Sony a7RII, with its 42MP sensor, offers a Super 35 crop mode with full pixel readout that is and so downscaled to 4K, with excellent results. Delight note that the Panasonic GH5 and GH5S do not crop when shooting 4K video.
When determining your resolution needs, y'all need to consider what your deliver market is. If your videos are only going up online, so you may not need anything higher than 1080p. Even if your product volition take a theatrical release, you may not need to make the spring to 4K. The ARRI Alexa, a Hollywood staple, (when in 16:nine mode) only records 2.7K-resolution video (2880 x 1620), and the footage looks good and sharp when projected in theaters. Yet with the tedious shift to Ultra HD televisions (3840 10 2160) and content underway, purchasing a camera with 4K resolution may help future-proof your investment, besides as make you more marketable should you lot decide to hire out your services or photographic camera package.
Fifty-fifty if yous'll be delivering in 2K/1080p, purchasing a camera than tin tape 4K/UHD is a smart thought, as downscaling your 4K video to 2K near always gives you lot sharper footage than if you recorded 2K in-camera. It too gives you a 4K principal that y'all tin can archive and so export in total resolution in the future, should you demand to. Additionally, you'll discover that many of the meridian video cameras these days offering 4K recording, so even if you lot only plan on shooting 2K/1080p, the photographic camera will exist set for 4K when you are.
Resolution isn't the entire story, and the ARRI ALEXA and AMIRA have been capturing perfectly acceptable images for years, at less than 4K resolution, that are shown at 4K. The ALEXA Mini is a versatile and popular camera at the high end of the Digital Cine platform. However, some are a slave to the need for 4K origination, no thing how adept the images may look, so ARRI has brought out the ALEXA LF, which meets and exceeds the 4K requirements of almost every distribution platform.
Sensitivity / Low-Lite Performance
An important factor for many shooters may be the depression-light functioning of a photographic camera. For larger productions with a full calorie-free package and crew, this might not exist equally important equally it would be for a educatee, apprentice, or indie filmmaker who plans on shooting with small packages or generally natural light. A contributing factor is pixel size. Generally, the larger the pixel, the amend information technology is at collecting calorie-free and reducing image noise. Thus, larger-sized sensors and sensors with lower pixel density tend to perform better in low lite.
There are other factors, equally well, such as sensor design and internal image processing and dissonance reduction. One technology that is starting to make its style into larger-sensor cameras is dorsum side illumination. This doesn't mean that there is a backlight on the sensor, simply rather that the sensor wiring is placed backside the photodiode substrate rather than in forepart of information technology, to improve low-cal-capturing capabilities. The engineering is seen in the Sony a7R II and, combined the with camera'southward total-frame sensor, allows it to have excellent depression-light performance despite its 42MP sensor.
While we're on the topic of sensitivity, information technology is worth mentioning that most cameras take a base or native ISO at which they perform best when recording with a log gamma; i.due east., the ISO where they take the nigh dynamic range. For many cameras, like the Catechism C300 Mark Ii, this is ISO 800. For other cameras, it's even higher. The Sony F55 has a native ISO of 1250, the F5 ISO 2000, and the compact a7S II a staggering ISO 3200 (the minimum required to record using Southward-Log2).
For optimal operation, many DPs will keep cameras at their native ISO and arrange the lighting accordingly. When shooting outside, this often requires the use of ND (neutral density) filters to reduce the amount of light hitting the sensor, whether it is a variable screw-on filter, square filters in a matte box, or built-in filters if the camera has that characteristic.
Global Shutter versus Rolling Shutter
Some other consideration is whether the camera uses a global shutter or a rolling shutter. Cameras that use a global shutter capture all the sensor data at one time, similar a film photographic camera with its mechanical rotary disc shutter, albeit electronically. Cameras that utilize a rolling shutter scan across the sensor line past line rather than all at once. Part of the theory behind this method is that the sensor can keep to collect photons as the process happens, thus increasing the sensitivity. The downside is that footage tin can accept on a noticeable wobble (normally referred to every bit the "jello effect") and motion skews with fast-moving subjects and photographic camera movements due to the scene irresolute faster than the camera can scan through the pixels. The consequence isn't very pleasing, and various cameras' rolling shutters can exist a deal-breaker for some moviemakers.
Even many professional person movie house cameras, including the ARRI Alexa, use a rolling shutter, but they use readout speeds of the sensor, effectively eliminating rolling shutter side effects in all merely extreme conditions. DSLRs and mirrorless cameras tend to exist some of the worst culprits—with some worse than others—so if fast-moving motion and handheld footage is part of your shooting mode, y'all should do your enquiry beforehand on the camera y'all're considering. If you tin can, go your easily on the camera for a weekend and meet if the camera's rolling shutter is acceptable for your shooting style. Other cameras, such equally the Sony F55 and Blackmagic URSA Mini employ electronic global shutters and some, such as Sony's flagship F65, even utilize a mechanical rotary disc for its global shutter.
Recording
When examining a camera's recording capabilities, there are a lot of things to consider beyond the resolution, including frame rates, codec, bit charge per unit, color depth, and color sampling. Additionally, many cameras offer video outputs that render higher paradigm quality when sent to an external recorder than can be recorded internally. Permit's expect at frame rates.
Frame Rates
It probably goes without maxim that you'll want a photographic camera that can record either 24p, which is the frame charge per unit at which motility picture films are shot in the Usa, or the 23.98 (23.976, to be precise) video equivalent. Pretty much any camera these days offers this frame rate, too equally the 29.97p frame charge per unit for television. If you're in the Uk or a PAL region land, you lot'll want a camera that can shoot 25p.
In add-on to these standard frame rates, if yous plan on doing whatever ho-hum-motion piece of work, and then you'll want a camera than tin shoot at higher frame rates, such equally 60p, 120p, or 240p, depending on how tedious you want to go. Often, the highest frame rates are offered at lower resolutions than a photographic camera's maximum resolution, or but in short bursts. For example, the Sony FS7 tin record 4K/UHD upward to 60p and 1920 10 1080 up to 180p, while the FS700 tin record 1920 10 1080 upwardly to 240p, but only in viii-second bursts.
Codecs and Bit Rates
Video captured by cameras is recorded internally to media cards using a variety of codecs. A codec compresses digital data to preserve storage space and makes it easier to play back apace. Codecs can range from highly compressed with depression flake rates (or data rates), such as AVCHD, to more than robust, less lossy codecs, such every bit Panasonic's AVC-Intra and Sony's XAVC. The higher the bit rate, the more information is existence recorded and, generally, the college the image quality. With higher bit rates also come larger file sizes and the need for more figurer resources to play back and edit the video.
In that location are 2 master categories of video compression to consider: interframe and intraframe. Interframe, sometimes referred to as long GOP (group of pictures) contains a set of grouped frames, or "cardinal frames," which reference each other to produce an epitome, resulting in smaller file sizes. With intraframe compression, each frame stands alone and contains all its own data. While intraframe files are larger, they also crave less processing power to play back and edit, as the computer doesn't need to await at a grouping of pictures all at once to display a single frame. Intraframe codecs tend to be used for higher bit-rate recording and are generally preferred for video origination, if available. Pop intermediate/editing codecs similar Apple ProRes, Avid DNxHD, and Cineform are all intraframe.
Color Fleck Depth
The camera's ability to reproduce colors with smooth gradation is very important to creating filmic images. The number of possible colors a camera can tape is adamant by the color depth, or flake depth. In viii-fleck video files, in that location are 8 bits of data for each colour channel, resulting in 256 shades of cerise, of green, and of blue, for a full of xvi.vii million possible colors. This may audio like a lot, but this still yields color banding in areas of gradation in tone. Only, seeing as most consumer monitors and HDTVs are 8-chip, you can unremarkably go abroad with cameras that record eight-chip.
Although viii-scrap is fine for a lot of applications, if you lot're going to be doing heavy color-grading work or compositing work, then you'll want a camera that offers ten-flake recording, which yields i,024 shades of ruby-red, of green, and of blue for a whopping 1.07 billion possible colors. Naturally, your file sizes will be much larger than with 8-bit, but yous'll have more color data to piece of work with. Across x-bit, you'll also observe 12-bit codecs in select loftier-stop models, too as 12-bit, 14-scrap, and sixteen-scrap raw formats.
Blush Sub-Sampling
Along with fleck depth, you'll also need to consider colour precision, which relates to how many samples of each color channel are taken; the higher the sampling charge per unit, the higher the precision. Without getting too technical, every pixel on a sensor registers a luminance value (brightness) and a chrominance value (color). Chroma sub-sampling is a process in which the luma value of each pixel is preserved, while groups of pixels are forced to share a same chroma sample, effectively becoming the same color.
A chroma sub-sampling of 4:four:iv means that in that location is no sub-sampling happening, the luminance and chroma data is recorded for each pixel, but this is simply available in the highest-terminate camera models or via an external recorder, if the photographic camera tin can output that betoken (more than on external recording later on). iv:2:two is a common subsample where every 2 pixels share a chroma sample while luminance is recorded for every pixel, resulting is plenty of color precision for most applications. Most consumer cameras, such as DSLRs and mirrorless cameras, use 4:2:0 sub-sampling, which throws abroad fifty-fifty more color information that makes it hard to practice chroma central work and can effect in blocky artifacts.
Raw
If you desire the most flexibility to adjust your images during post product, then y'all may want to consider cameras with raw recording capabilities. Raw is different from log gamma and uncompressed video in that information technology'south non really a video file; information technology is, as the name suggests, raw data. Much like a yet photo shot in raw format, raw video doesn't bake in any in-camera decisions, allowing you to adjust things like white remainder and exposure in post. Raw data is usually at a higher bit depth, likewise, between 12-bit and 16-flake, and frequently with 4:four:4 sub-sampling, giving you lot the most color information the photographic camera offers.
Raw can be both uncompressed and compressed, and in proprietary or open source formats, such every bit CinemaDNG. Compressing raw may seem counterintuitive, but raw data already takes up a lot of space, then compressing it helps. Some cameras merits to have visually lossless compression, while other cameras let you choose how much compression is being applied, such equally 3:i to eighteen:1 on RED cameras. To be viewed, raw files have to starting time get through a de-bayer procedure to be converted to video. The video is usually converted to a log gamma format, assuasive you to utilize similar LUTs that you use on log footage.
A raw workflow can be very costly and, unless you're shooting a major movement moving picture or TV commercial, a simple log gamma recording may suffice. The amount of space that raw recordings take up is enormous, meaning yous'll eat through media cards and need plenty of storage drives, not to mention a computer capable of handling the footage. RED Digital Cinema offers compressed raw recording, which can save you a tremendous amount of storage space, while notwithstanding providing the control in postal service that y'all become with raw recording.
If yous want raw then in that location are certainly affordable cameras bachelor, including the Blackmagic Pocket Movie theatre Camera 4K, but you should really have a compelling reason to shoot raw before jumping into it.
External Recording
To record the highest quality with DSLRs and mirrorless cameras, information technology often means splurging for an external recorder. Many of these cameras offering uncompressed video output over HDMI, allowing you lot to featherbed internal compression and low-fleck-rate codecs in favor of higher-quality and edit-friendly codecs, such as Apple ProRes and Avid DNxHD. In addition to uncompressed video, some cameras that can merely record eight-bit 4:2:0 video internally can output 8-bit 4:two:two or even 10-bit 4:ii:2 in some cases, such as the Panasonic GH4. For Sony'south a7S, its HDMI output provides the only style to record UHD video, making an external recorder a requirement for many shooters.
Not only DSLR and mirrorless cameras do good from an external recorder. Accept the Sony FS7 or FS7II, for instance. These cameras are able to output 4K and 2K ten-flake raw over SDI to Sony's AXS-R7 Recorder or to Convergent Design's Odyssey 7Q+ monitor/recorder via the XDCA-FS7 Extension Unit. The Sony FS5 with the RAW Output firmware update also benefits from an external recorder that tin record RAW. Even for cameras that record raw or high-resolution and high-bit-rate video internally, there is still a benefit to using an external recorder, as they often record to fast and relatively inexpensive SSDs rather than costlier media, such as SxS or CFast 2.0 cards. Before purchasing a camera, be sure to note whether it would benefit from an external recorder, and if the added cost of one is worth the benefits that it brings.
ProRes RAW
Apple appear, in 2018, ii flavors of ProRes Raw, bachelor in conjunction with the Atomos Sumo 19 and Shogun Inferno recorders. At this writing, ProRes RAW recording is capable from the Sony FS5, FS5II, FS7, FS7II, Panasonic EVA1, Varicam, Varicam LT, Catechism C300 Marker II, C500, and C700. Look for more cameras to join the list in the future.
Grade Factor and Connectivity
While we have focused mostly on paradigm quality, the form factor of a photographic camera and how it handles might be a determining factor for you. Cameras come in a variety of shapes and sizes, each with its own pros and cons. Smaller cameras are easy to pack and travel with, simply lack many of the conveniences of larger, professional video cameras, peculiarly in terms of connectivity.
On the opposite side, larger cameras are just that—larger and heavier, and frequently require expensive accessories to get upwards and running. Even after outfitting a DSLR with a muzzle, 15mm rod back up organisation, external audio recorder or adapter box, and even an external power solution, chances are that it will yet be cheaper than many of the professional person models bachelor. Additionally, yous ever must be able to strip the rig down and modify it as needed. Nonetheless, at that place is a reason professional person cameras are larger and more expensive, as they are packed with college-quality recording options and video-specific controls and features.
Ultimately, yous'll have to weigh the pros and cons of each camera available and decide for yourself which features are of import to you and which you are willing to compromise on to stay inside your budget. I hope that this article gives you some nutrient for thought and helps you to select the camera that is right for you.
This is quite a bit to digest. What are your thoughts? Share them in the Comments department, below.
Source: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/video/buying-guide/cinema-cameras-what-filmmakers-need-know
Posted by: leonreaccurtut.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Do You Need To Have A Full Frqamed Camera To Take Professional Pictures"
Post a Comment