Shaw argues against mandated Netflix Cancon tax, calls for broadcast competition
Shaw is opposing Bell by proposing to pass up the idea of a mandated Netflix Canadian content contribution taxation, according to its submission to the Broadcasting and Telecommunications Legislative Review.
Co-ordinate to an Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Online request from University of Ottawa law professor Michael Geist, Shaw is arguing for more regulatory flexibility and broadcast competition.
"A regulatory framework that depends on foreign [over-the-peak (OTT)] services to achieve the cultural objectives of Canada'southward domestic broadcasting system volition likely pb to issues of enforcement as well as inconsistent and unsatisfactory results," the submission reads.
The company is arguing for the removal of the mandated five pct contributions by broadcast distributing units (BDUs). Shaw is against the formation of a new Isp tax, stating that there are several issues with it, such as affordability and harm to innovation.
This preliminary written report from the expert panel on broadcast and telecommunication law reform was set to become available in June.
Shaw'due south stance comes after Bell's submission to the BTLR, in which information technology called for the regulation of several American companies, including Netflix and Amazon Prime.
The submission from Bell likewise called for the criminalization of those who are fifty-fifty slightly associated with unauthorized online video streaming.
Shaw says that at that place should be a "more than flexibile, market-driven approach" in order to reach the objectives of the Broadcasting Act. It believes that consumers would benefit from the introduction of an obligation put on OTT providers, such as Netflix, to focus on the availability of Canadian content.
The visitor says this will avoid possible trade agreement conflicts. Shaw does, all the same, back up sales taxes on Netflix.
Shaw is also arguing that broadcast suppliers already contribute to Canadian content past investing in its spread via its networks.
Bell's submission to the BLTR is focused more on self-interest, while Shaw's submission hopes for a 'lightweight regulatory model' based on competition and improved pricing.
Source: Michael Geist ATIP documents
Source: https://mobilesyrup.com/2019/05/29/shaw-argues-against-mandated-netflix-cancon-tax-calls-broadcast-competition/
Posted by: leonreaccurtut.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Shaw argues against mandated Netflix Cancon tax, calls for broadcast competition"
Post a Comment